For St.Stephen’s University, Essentials Green Worship Course, the Institue of Contemporary and Emerging Worship Studies for Dan Wilt
I’ve been thinking about accessibility and cultural relevance…
In all of our working toward becoming more culturally relevant and accessible to more people, we sometimes become less accessible. Often, because our church community is our main community outside of work, we understand relevance more as it relates to Sunday morning than we do in a day to day context.
As worship leaders, we naturally want worship to be relevant in our Sunday (or whichever day) services. But in church as a whole, we can become naval gazers even in that. We no longer see ourselves as relevant in life, but try to be relevant in the church building. Our diversity goes far beyond what can be accomplished in one service, one day of the week. Or even in several programs or bible studies or events throughout the week that are hosted by the church.
I think this begins with something Dan Wilt said, “Expose yourself to other worship expressions going on in your city”.1 I would take this further still, and say “Expose yourself to other expressions going on in your city”. For any artist, exposure to different types of art is essential to development. Even though there are many denominations and church styles, for the most part we will always sing hymns and contemporary worship songs that have a similar sound. We have been saying this makes us accessible, and indeed it does make it accessible to a greater group of people. However, there will be those who do not engage in that style of music or art. For them to go to a folk concert or a blues jam or a punk show would be equally as beneficial as going to another church’s worship service. Whether or not the music is “Christian” is irrelevant to the fact that God can use any music to inspire and engage people to worship.
As a dancer, when I began to lead dancers, I noticed that the “Christian” dance that was available was only liturgical and/or an extremely simple style of dance led by older women that didn’t have the ability to move well and wore clothes that covered themselves so fully that one couldn’t decipher in they were actually dancing at all. Don’t get me wrong, I love that people feel the freedom to worship, but is this all we have to offer? I began to take many classes of all different styles, including African, hip hop, and modern contemporary dance, and found that it was much easier to express with my body my worship because I had good training and a foundation of moves from which to choose.
Mark Miller said, “if we are to have an outward focus and continue to grow, our worship must resonate close to current culture”.2 To know current culture, we must be in current culture. As as artist, this means getting out to art shows, seeing bands and choirs, symphonies and dance companies. Inspiration comes in all of these places. I want to be relevant in church services, but also in my artistic world outside the church. I want to be a respected presence in the artistic community. And as a visual artist, there may not be a place in my particular worship community to use my gifts in a Sunday morning if I want to be accessible to the majority who attend. However, at an art show, I can be accessible and culturally relevant while being Jesus in the midst of the city I am in.
I think it is so important to be relevant and accessible in our churches. My hope is that we don’t stop there, that church service does not keep us looking inward and instead becomes a springboard to move outward. When we move outward, we should be inspired again to move inward. We must be relevant and accessible in the world as well as in corporate worship.
1. Dan Wilt, Inside Worship Magazine, Vol. 61, p. 11
2. Mark Miller, Inside Worship Magazine, Vol. 49, p. 8


